Black Book Online is not a credit reporting agency as defined by the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and our search results are not consumer reports as defined by the FCRA. This website does not include all existing public record searches. Search descriptions, search content, and data through-dates may be mislabeled or otherwise inaccurate, incorrect or missing. Errors, including false "no hits," may exist in results returned. We make no guarantees, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy of this data or service. Sellers said he disagreed with Biggs’ characterization.Ĭorinne Murdock is a reporter for AZ Free News.TERMS AND CONDITIONS: Your use of Black Book Online indicates your acceptance of the following terms and conditions: Use of this website is at your own risk. Fontes as well – is that the same Stephen Richer?” asked Biggs. “That’s the same recorder that campaigned that Adrian Fontes was incompetent and called him a criminal, and he’s the guy that was running the 2020 election – and you actually hired someone to oversee Mr. “I do think it’s important that our recorder will be answering every question in a timely fashion.” ![]() “I just know that because there is limited space on these servers, when you have to run that election, you have to make room for the additional election data,” said Sellers. Neither Gates or Sellers said they could confirm immediately. Maricopa County’s Twitter account stated that deleting files that have been archived is a standard practice after all elections. “I find it frankly laughable to suggest that a county in response to a subpoena could say ‘We will delete files from the hard drives and materials that we give to the auditors because we have those files archived on data that we did not give to the auditors when the subpoena said give all those records to the election,’” responded Bennett. “We responded to the subpoena,” repeated Gates.Īt that point, Bennett stated that it was “laughable” that the county essentially created a loophole in the subpoena by archiving files from the materials explicitly subpoenaed. “Okay, so – you didn’t feel obligated to turn over then, to them?” asked Biggs. Gates’ response prompted laughter from Biggs. ![]() “They did not subpoena those, that’s correct,” responded Gates. “When you released these servers and this information to the auditors to begin with, they didn’t have access to those archives at first – is that fair to say?” asked Biggs. When Biggs asked Gates to clarify if those “maintain” files were deleted off servers after the election, Sellers nodded and added that the files were “archived.” Biggs then asked whether the Arizona Senate was given the archives as part of the subpoena. “I would say that it is appropriate to maintain files, and that’s exactly what we did,” said Gates. Bennett said he “hoped not.” Gates initially attempted to characterize the deletion as mere maintenance. He first asked the Arizona Senate’s liaison to the election audit, Ken Bennett, if it was standard practice to delete files off a server after an election. ![]() The supervisors’ main defense for deleting the records had to do with freeing space for future election files – but Congressman Andy Biggs (R-AZ-05) pointed out that files from prior elections were on the equipment obtained by the subpoena.īiggs’ line of questioning prompted the admission from Gates and Sellers. Chairman Jack Sellers and Vice Chairman Bill Gates made this admission during the House Oversight Committee hearing on the Cyber Ninjas-led audit on Thursday. Maricopa County officials admitted that they deleted election files from equipment after purportedly archiving them prior to fulfilling the Arizona Senate’s subpoena for that equipment.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |